Asset Management, Asset Reliability, Asset Utilization, Asset Optimization, Equipment Reliability, Reliability Centered Maintenance, Preventative/Predictive Maintenance, Process Optimization, Proactive Maintenance, Failure Modes, Condition Monitoring, Condition Based Monitoring
  Asset Management, Asset Reliability, Asset Utilization, Asset Optimization, Equipment Reliability, Reliability Centered Maintenance, Preventative/Predictive Maintenance, Process Optimization, Proactive Maintenance, Failure Modes, Condition Monitoring, Condition Based Monitoring
 
Asset Management, Asset Reliability, Asset Utilization, Asset Optimization, Equipment Reliability, Reliability Centered Maintenance, Preventative/Predictive Maintenance, Process Optimization, Proactive Maintenance, Failure Modes, Condition Monitoring, Condition Based Monitoring Asset Management, Asset Reliability, Asset Utilization, Asset Optimization, Equipment Reliability, Reliability Centered Maintenance, Preventative/Predictive Maintenance, Process Optimization, Proactive Maintenance, Failure Modes, Condition Monitoring, Condition Based Monitoring Asset Management, Asset Reliability, Asset Utilization, Asset Optimization, Equipment Reliability, Reliability Centered Maintenance, Preventative/Predictive Maintenance, Process Optimization, Proactive Maintenance, Failure Modes, Condition Monitoring, Condition Based Monitoring Asset Management, Asset Reliability, Asset Utilization, Asset Optimization, Equipment Reliability, Reliability Centered Maintenance, Preventative/Predictive Maintenance, Process Optimization, Proactive Maintenance, Failure Modes, Condition Monitoring, Condition Based Monitoring
Asset Management, Asset Reliability, Asset Utilization, Asset Optimization, Equipment Reliability, Reliability Centered Maintenance, Preventative/Predictive Maintenance, Process Optimization, Proactive Maintenance, Failure Modes, Condition Monitoring, Condition Based Monitoring
Asset Management, Asset Reliability, Asset Utilization, Asset Optimization, Equipment Reliability, Reliability Centered Maintenance, Preventative/Predictive Maintenance, Process Optimization, Proactive Maintenance, Failure Modes, Condition Monitoring, Condition Based Monitoring
Asset Management, Asset Reliability, Asset Utilization, Asset Optimization, Equipment Reliability, Reliability Centered Maintenance, Preventative/Predictive Maintenance, Process Optimization, Proactive Maintenance, Failure Modes, Condition Monitoring, Condition Based Monitoring
Asset Management, Asset Reliability, Asset Utilization, Asset Optimization, Equipment Reliability, Reliability Centered Maintenance, Preventative/Predictive Maintenance, Process Optimization, Proactive Maintenance, Failure Modes, Condition Monitoring, Condition Based Monitoring

Asset Health Assurance

The Asset Health Standard Flow looks at two general questions that must be addressed:
                    How Much? How Well?

With regard to the often utilized P-F Curve, most “maintenance initiatives” focus on Point F and try to “manage the event’. When your focus is on Asset Health, your focus is on Point P – “early identification and elimination of the defect”. So, as soon as an inspection (though either a PM or condition monitoring) can identify that a defect is present (Point P - “Early Signal”), that asset is RED!

This early identification of the defect can enable the Proactive Workflow Model. This is in marked contrast to merely utilizing the technologies to optimize a run to failure maintenance strategy. If you have an optimized PM/condition monitoring process that is failure mode driven, that process (including inspections and follow-up work) drives 75-85% of your workflow. If you plan and schedule your work, execute the work with precision, and have a continuous improvement process – you will be a pace-setter.

It is for this reason that Asset Health needs to be a balanced score card metric, but for it to be meaningful, a standardized approach must be applied. As with any important metric in any corporation, if there isn’t a standard, the metric will approach and exceed expectations regardless of what really happens.

The Asset Health Standard Flow looks at two general questions that must be addressed, How Much? and How Well? That is, how do we know that a facility reporting Asset Health is applying the standard to a high enough percentage of their assets to be representative, and how do we know that everyone is applying the same standards, in a comparable way, and with a comparable level of rigor?

As illustrated in the Asset Health Standard Flow, there is several process steps recommended for a facility to run an Asset Health Report. But in order to do so, a minimum standard for each process must be agreed upon and met using PM/PdM Best Practices recommendations.
In an effort to maximize reliability improvements and yield a stronger Return on Asset Reliability (ROAR), Allied recommends adopting the Asset Health Standard.

Conditioned Based Monitoring
Asset Health Assurance
CBM Delivery
Model
arrow Small Plant Model
arrow TEAM

Home
Glossary of Terms
ROAR™
What We Do
Who We Are
People Are Talking
Careers
Frequently Asked Questions
Allied in the Community
Members Only
Contact Us
   

Allied Reliability, Inc.

4360 Corporate Rd. #110
N. Charleston, SC 29405

USA Phone:
843-414-5760

USA Toll Free:
888-414-5760

Fax:
843-414-5779

info@alliedreliability.com

Copyright 2007 | Allied Reliability Inc. | Privacy
Comments, suggestions, concerns about this page?
Contact the Website Administrator