Upcoming Public Workshops:

Planning & Scheduling Fundamentals

January 2020

28 - 30
Charleston, SC
Register Now
Reliability Fundamentals

February 2020

4 - 6
Charleston, SC
Register Now
Reliability Improvement Roadmap Workshop

February 2020

18 - 18
Houston, TX
Register Now
Digital Transformation in Reliability

February 2020

19 - 19
Houston, TX
Register Now
Introduction to Reliability Centered Lubrication (RCL)

February 2020

20 - 20
Houston, TX
Register Now
Shutdown, Turnaround, Outage

February 2020

25 - 27
Houston, TX
Register Now
Advanced Reciprocating Compressor Analysis

March 2020

3 - 5
Houston, TX
Register Now
Condition Monitoring Fundamentals

March 2020

17 - 19
Houston, TX
Register Now
Planning & Scheduling Fundamentals

March 2020 - April 2020

31 - 2
Houston, TX
Register Now
Leading Reliability Improvement

April 2020

21 - 23
Houston, TX
Register Now
Root Cause Analysis (RCA)

April 2020

28 - 30
Charleston, SC
Register Now
Basic Reciprocating Compressor Analysis

April 2020

28 - 30
Houston, TX
Register Now
Reliability Fundamentals

July 2020

7 - 9
Charleston, SC
Register Now
Condition Monitoring Fundamentals

August 2020

4 - 6
Charleston, SC
Register Now
Reliability Improvement Roadmap Workshop

August 2020

11 - 11
Charleston, SC
Register Now
Planning & Scheduling Fundamentals

August 2020

18 - 20
Charleston, SC
Register Now
Leading Reliability Improvement

September 2020

15 - 17
Charleston, SC
Register Now
Reliability Fundamentals

September 2020

22 - 24
Houston, TX
Register Now
Intermediate Planning & Scheduling

September 2020 - October 2020

29 - 1
Charleston, SC
Register Now
Shutdown, Turnaround, Outage

October 2020

6 - 8
Charleston, SC
Register Now
Root Cause Analysis (RCA)

October 2020

6 - 8
Houston, TX
Register Now
Leading Reliability Improvement

October 2020

13 - 15
Charleston, SC
Register Now
Basic Reciprocating Compressor Analysis

October 2020

13 - 15
Houston, TX
Register Now
Reliability Fundamentals

November 2020

3 - 5
Charleston, SC
Register Now
Reliability Improvement Roadmap Workshop

November 2020

17 - 17
Charleston, SC
Register Now
Chat With An Expert. Our reliability experts are ready to answer your questions
Hire For Success Download Our Whitepaper
Chat With An Expert. Our reliability experts are ready to answer your questions

Which is right for you? OEE vs. MTBF

You may already be familiar with some of the metrics used to measure the performance of your assets.  If you have had some exposure to the common thinking on this topic, they you are likely familiar with the terms OEE (Overall Equipment Effectiveness) and MTBF (Mean Time Between Failure). Both of these metrics can be very informative and drive specific behaviors when applied correctly. When applied incorrectly they could lead to confusion and frustration.  In this post, I hope to shed some light on which of these measures may be more meaningful for your organization.

Let’s start with Overall Equipment Effectiveness.

Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE)

The layman’s version of OEE is simply defined as what percentage of the time that you were capable of running good product at full capacity and with acceptable quality did you do so? Perfection at OEE is 100%. Anything more than that and you are breaking a few of the basic laws of physics, but we will save that discussion for another time.

The common formula for OEE is as follows:

Screen Shot 2018-04-16 at 8.53.57 PM 

OEE = Overall Equipment Effectiveness

A = Availability = The percentage of the time that you actually ran and produced something.

P = Performance Efficiency = During this time that you actually produced, at what percentage of your rated capacity (speed, throughput, etc.) did you actually run.

Q = Quality Rate = For all of the units that you produced, what percentage of them were acceptable for sale to the customer, meeting the stated quality requirements. 

For example:

Availability = 80%

Performance Efficiency = 90%

Quality Rate = 99%

OEE = 80% X 90% X 99%

OEE = 71.28%

OEE is a fantastic measure for a few important reasons:

  • Nowhere in the definition do the words “maintenance” or “operations” appear. It brings us together under one common measure. It facilitates two teams who can easily work at cross-purposes to work together. For example, availability losses can be experienced as a result of both maintenance and operating practices.
  • It forces us to focus on the loss of potential rather than what we have accomplished with no idea of what might be possible.
  • It brings together three aspects that are critical to meeting our customer’s needs. For example, if we only measured availability, we might overlook the fact that we ran at 50% speed.

OEE is a bit of a universal metric.  It includes many of the critical aspects of your performance into a single metric.  If you include some safety and cost measures you are approaching a well formed maintenance scorecard.

Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF)

Mean Time Between Failure tells us how often, on average (mean), we should expect to see an asset fail to fulfill its function. Higher MTBF performance is always considered to be better, as it indicates that your asset performs it intended function longer without any interruption attributed to failures.  Downtime that may exist associated with planned maintenance activities are excluded from this calculation.

A simple definition for MTBF is:

MTBF = Operating Hours ÷ Number of Failures

Operating Hours = The time frame (frequency of measurement).

Number of Failures = The number of occurrences where the asset failed to fulfill its function.

Note: MTBF is the reciprocal of the Failure Rate (1/MTBF = Failure Rate).

For example:

Assume we measure MTBF on a monthly basis (30 days or 720 hours), and we have experienced 10 failures in this time frame.

MTBF = 720 hours ÷ 10 failures = 72 hours

MTBF = 30 days ÷ 10 failures = 3 days

This means that under current conditions, we should expect to experience a failure (loss of function) every 72 hour.

MTBF is a relative measure. Measuring MTBF on a highly critical asset or group of assets can be very meaningful. Measuring MTBF across an entire department or facility provides less value.

It is also important to note that MTBF does not consider situations where assets are running at a reduced rate, nor does it consider the size and duration of the event (not all failures are equal – some are longer and have a greater impact than others).

The key to leveraging MTBF is to understand where these failures came from, and to develop focused strategies that will eliminate them. Your Root Cause Failure Analysis (RCFA) skills becomes very important when you are measuring MTBF.

Which is right for you? OEE or MTBF?

My short answer to this question is that if you can measure OEE in a meaningful way, then this is the metric for you.  It covers many of the bases. Sadly, OEE does not fit in all situations.

Discreet Manufacturing

Discrete manufacturing is the production of distinct items. Automobiles, furniture, toys, smartphones, and airplanes are examples of discrete manufacturing products. You can easily identify a single item produced by discreet manufacturing.

If this definition fits, then OEE is for you. You should be concerned about factors such as availability, performance efficiency, and quality rate. These factors are central to your success.

Process Industries

Process industries are those who run a continuous batch where distinction between one unit and another is not easily identified. Power generation, oil production, transport, and refining, as well as many petrochemical processes fall into this category.

Unfortunately, in these types of environments, OEE might not serve our purposes for the following reasons:

  • Availability is often so critical in process industries that we see a high level of redundant equipment (with a corresponding capital investment). If we experience a failure of one piece of equipment, we switch over to the redundant unit and continue on. For this reason, availability losses are usually greatly minimized.
  • Performance efficiency losses can exist, but rather than run slow, we often immediately bring the backup unit online and begin a fix to the underperforming unit.
  • It is often difficult, if not impossible, to identify quality losses in process industries. What does a bad kilowatt look like?

In these situations, establishing MTBF as a meaningful measure on specific highly critical assets and trending your performance upward will likely provide much more value than OEE.

Conclusion

Metrics are a funny thing. When used correctly and with the right application, they can provide a lot of value and focus to an organization. Used incorrectly, they tend to cause more harm than good.

When selecting the best metrics for your team, consider the following advice:

  • Keep it simple. Too many measures cloud the focus.
  • Make sure we know what actions to take in order to improve the performance of each metric. What must we do differently in order to improve? It sounds obvious, but surprisingly it is often overlooked.
  • Talk about it often. A metric is only as good as the leader who draws the team together to own it and act on it.
left right
Recent Articles
4 Tips for Improving Operator Engagement at Your Plant
Engaged employees are always the most invested, which generally results in improved performance—but it can be difficult to keep operators engaged....
Operator Care
Read More
Managing Risk with Your STO Process
Shutdowns, Turnarounds, and Outages (STO): depending on your industry, you use one of these terms to represent the planned and controlled shutdown of...
shutdown management
Read More
Key Elements for an Effective Reliability Program
An effective reliability program is comprehensive and must take into account the entire process — from design to execution. It is exceptionally...
Developing procedures
Read More